05/16/2007

HOME

VILLAGE NEWS

GRANTS

ARCHIVES

AGAJA

KUYO

BARUPE

WECHE DONGRUOK

MBAKA

NONRO

JEXJALUO  

NGECHE LUO

GI GWENG'

THUM

TEDO

LUO KITGI GI TIMBEGI

SIGENDNI LUO

THUOND WECHE


 

;Hit Counter

 
  
 

Google
 

Re: The Independent State of Somaliland


Dear Meshark Owino and Paul Nyandoto,
 
Regional Autonomy
 
It is refreshing that you have carried on with debate on the merits and demerits for Regionalism or Majimboism, as the case may be depending on the writer. Each of these views has propagandists. We have written and shared views on Regional Autonomy for a while now, then took a break.
 
For a start, the quest for Regionalism and Economic emancipation is not a new ideology anywhere in the world. The tendency for homogeneous groups to break away and become autonomous is as old as history itself. On the other hand Unification of Sovereign, autonomous or homogeneous groups under one rule has always been done through force or conquest. Examples exist from exploits of Alexander the Great, The Romans, Ottoman Empire, Persian Empire, Austro - Hungarian Empire, the Japanese, Russians, The British, the French, Portuguese, Spanish, Empires, The Shangani, the Fulani, and Ethiopian.
 
One common factor with Empires is that they tended not to be democratic, but rather ruled by Dictators, Warlords etc.
 
Let us look at Great Britain today and how it has evolved over the years. First was the The Kingdom of England. Originally a group of Germanic tribes migrated into modern England from Northern Germany settled here. The Romans conquered these lands at about AD43 and ruled it for about 400 years. They left on their own, perhaps due to pressure elsewhere in the Roman Empire. London area was basically a Danish colony until after unification of several Anglo Saxon ruled English petty Kingdoms. This unification was achieved by Alfred the Great, King of Wessex, proclaiming himself King of England in 886, and throwing out the Danes from London .
 
The period after the Romans, the country was ruled interchangeably between West Saxon and Danish Kings for half a century until the Norman invasion of 1066 AD under William the Conqueror. Next, Kingdom of England was more or less a vassal state under the Kings in France , until English Kings asserted sovereignty on realizing England had become more prosperous than counterparts in Europe as a result of both political stability, innovations, trade and industry.
 
Wales was basically divided into Principalities ruled by English Monarchs, by virtue of Statute of Rhuddlan in 1284, and only became part of the Kingdom of England by the Laws in Wales Acts 1535-1542 . Wales then shared a legal identity with England as a joint entity called England . Then came reformation which the English used as an excuse to remove Roman Catholic Church from control of her Religious come Political Affairs, and the rise of Anglicanism under Henry VIII.
 
Both the The Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland were ruled by a single Monarch since 1603 under James I, but under different Legal systems. They merged to form the unified Kingdom of Great Britain under the Acts of Union on 01/05/1707, making both England (and Wales) and Scotland loses their individual political, identities, while retaining separate legal identities.
This union has changed its name twice: on the merger with the Kingdom of Ireland following the Act of Union in 1800 which created the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1801; and again following the secession from the union of the Irish Free State ( Now Republic of Ireland) under the terms of the Government of Ireland Act 1920 ; it became the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .
 
England has always retained a separate legal identity from its partners, with a separate legal system , English law , from say Northern Ireland - Northern Ireland law , and Scotland - Scottish law .
 
Later due to the strong feelings of the Welsh, England became known as England and Wales, to give the Welsh some recognition.
 
While England was ruled jointly by a monarch and the Parliament of England up to 1706, the Scottish and Welsh governing institutions were created by the UK parliament giving each country a separate and distinct political identity. That left England, which has a majority population in UK of over 80%, as the only part of Britain directly ruled in nearly all matters by the British government in London.
 
On parliamentary matters, a convention called the West Lothian question has become controversial. Before Scottish devolution, purely-Scottish matters were debated at Westminster , but subject to a convention that only Scottish MPs could vote on them without a "reverse" convention for England and Wales . For Wales this anomaly was sorted with Welsh devolution, so that Scottish and Welsh MPs can vote on English issues, but Scottish and Welsh issues are not debated at Westminster at all
 
There are calls for a devolved English Parliament with voices calling for the dissolution of the Union entirely, meaning Regional Autonomies including in England as well. The Labour government has argued that England is too large to be governed as a single sub-state entity and proposed the devolution of power to the Regions of England , but with very limited autonomy. The government claimed that a devolved English parliament for entire England would dwarf the rest of the United Kingdom.
 
When put to the first referendum in the North East in November 2004, to decide whether people wanted to vote for directly-elected regional assemblies to watch over the work of the non-elected Regional Development Agencies , it was defeated.   Why? Criticism of the proposals varied from;-
  1. England did not need "another tier of bureaucracy",
  2. Decentralization was inadequate
  3. proposal amounted not to devolution, but merely local government re-organization, with no real power being removed from central government, and no real power given to the regions, which would not even gain the limited powers of the Welsh and Scottish Assemblies such as the tax-varying and legislative powers of the Scottish Parliament or the expanded powers of the welsh Assembly.
 
All these arguments are for citizens who want more control over their affairs. The voting trends recently is a clear pointer at this desire, both in Wales, Scotland and England where the English in recent local Authority elections, conservatives gained against Labour, because they think Conservatives are more pro England and Englishness, conservatism, more individual freedom of choice, less government, anti- European super state, preservation of English currency, unit of measure such as the pound, the mile, the pint, etc, anti-immigration, etc.
 
Take the case for Finland where Nyandoto lives. It has a population of 5,282,583 people spread over 338,145 square kilometers is one the most sparsely populated country in the European Union . It was previously part of the Swedish kingdom and later an autonomous Duchy in the Russian Empire , until it declared its independence on December 6 , 1917 . The SwedishKingdom strove to push the borders eastward, which led to wars of varying success .
 
This expansion was halted by the unification of Russia and was rolled back. In the 18th century, virtually all of Finland was twice occupied by Russian forces, 1714 - 1721 and 1742 - 1743 .  From 29/03/ 1809 , after being conquered by the armies of Russian Emperor Alexander I , Finland became a semi-autonomous Grand Duchy under the Russian Empire until the end of 1917.
 
It is said that relationship between the Finnish Grand Duchy and the Russian Empire gradually soured when the Russian government made moves to restrict the Finnish autonomy , leading to Finnish Wars of Independence and Civil War (1917-1918) On December 6 , 1917 , shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, Finland declared its independence .
 
Why would a sparsely populated Territory fight to be autonomous when being part of an empire should be good for them?
 
The same trend has continued with Yugoslavia , former Soviet Union, Indonesia (East Timor), Macau and the Portuguese, Chechnya, Spain and the Bask separatists, Indian Kashmir, Uganda, and Katanga in DRC etc. It is not wishful thinking of a few.
 
As seen above, the political Union in United Kingdom was sealed in various Treaties and Acts of Parliament. It is a voluntary Union and not one that cannot be broken.
 
It is a fallacy to argue that if Kenya follows that path of Regional Autonomy then the Regions will fail since it has nothing to do with segregation or Bantustanism. Trade, globalization and cross border Investment means no Region can stay in isolation. The call here is for the Regions to be Centres of good governance; corruption free, transparent and citizen’s involvement in planning and economic choice, rather than a system too far removed and alien from the governed. It should also promote local languages and culture.
 
Joseph Okumu
London
14/05/2007
 
=====================================================

 
Joluo.com

Akelo nyar Kager, jaluo@jaluo.com


IDWARO TICH?


INJILI GOSPEL


ABILA

INVEST with JALUO

WENDO MIWA PARO

OD PAKRUOK

 

                            Copyright © 1999-2007, Jaluo dot com
                                All Rights Reserved