Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:52:39 -0800 (PST)
SUPPORT
CONGRESSMAN PAYNE ON HCON 283 IH Congress Resolution on Kenya
Calling for a peaceful resolution to the current electoral crisis in
Kenya. (Introduced in House)
HCON 283 IH
110th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 283
Calling for a peaceful resolution to the current electoral crisis in
Kenya.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2008
Mr. PAYNE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Calling for a peaceful resolution to the current electoral crisis in
Kenya.
- Whereas in 1991, President Daniel arap Moi agreed to move
to multi-party politics, eight years after his government had amended
the constitution to legalize one-party rule. The move to a multi-party
state came after two years of an anti-government political campaign by
opposition groups and persistent pressure by donor governments;
- Whereas in 1992, Kenyans voted in record numbers in the
country's first multi-party election in almost 26 years. President Moi
defeated opposition candidates by a small margin. His party, the Kenya
African National Union (KANU), won a majority in the 210-seat
parliament, despite the defeat of several senior KANU officials by
opposition candidates;
- Whereas in 1997, Kenya held its second multi-party
elections, at the height of tensions between the opposition and the
ruling party. President Moi was re-elected with 40 percent of the votes
cast, while his nearest rival, Mwai Kibaki, won 31 percent;
- Whereas in 2002, the opposition succeeded in forming and
holding together a coalition, known as NARC (National Rainbow
Coalition), that ousted KANU from power by wide margins. NARC won 132
seats in parliament, compared with KANU's 67, while Kibaki defeated
Uhuru Kenyatta, son of Jomo Kenyatta, for the presidency with a 62
percent majority;
- Whereas the 2002 had a positive impact in Kenya as well as
in Africa generally. The smooth transfer of power and the transparency
in the conduct of the elections indicated that democracy can flourish
in Africa. The power of incumbency and the entrenched clout of a ruling
party did not stop an opposition victory in Kenya;
- Whereas Kenya has been a valuable U.S. ally since
independence, providing the United States with access to its military
facilities and political support in the United Nations. Washington once
considered Kenya a model developing country with shared democratic
values in a continent where civil wars raged and military and
authoritarian governments reigned;
- Whereas Kenya has been an important ally in the war
against terrorism, especially since the U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya
and Tanzania in 1998. Kenya has been one of the major recipients of
U.S. foreign assistance in Sub-Saharan Africa for decades, and is an
important trading partner with the United States;
- Whereas on December 27, 2007, the citizens of Kenya went
peacefully to the polls to elect a new parliament and a new President
and signaled their commitment to democracy by turning out in large
numbers and, in some instances, waiting in long lines to vote;
- Whereas on December 29, 2007, the opposition presidential
candidate, Raila Odinga, was reportedly over 300,000 votes ahead of the
incumbent with 90 percent of the precincts reporting;
- Whereas on December 30, 2007, the head of the Electoral
Commission of Kenya (ECK) declared that Mwai Kibaki won the
presidential election by 197,000 votes;
- Whereas Mr. Kibaki was sworn in as President within an
hour of the announcement of the election results, despite serious
concerns raised about the legitimacy of the election results by
domestic and international observers;
- Whereas the lack of transparency in vote tallying, serious
irregularities reported by election observers, the implausibility of
the margin of victory, and the swearing in of the Party of National
Unity presidential candidate with undue haste, all serve to undermine
the credibility of the presidential election results;
- Whereas the Government of Kenya imposed a ban on live
media that day, and shortly after the election results were announced,
in contravention of Kenyan law, the Government also announced a blanket
ban on public assembly and gave police the authority to use lethal
force;
- Whereas on January 1, 2008, four commissioners on the ECK
issued a statement which called into question the election results
announced by the Commission and for a judicial review;
- Whereas the head of the European Union Election
Observation Mission stated that `Lack of transparency as well as a
number of verified irregularities ... cast doubt on the accuracy of the
results of the presidential election as announced by the ECK' and
called for an international audit of the results;
- Whereas observers from the East African Community have
called for an investigation into irregularities during the tallying
process and for those responsible for such irregularities to be held
accountable;
- Whereas more than 700 people have died and an estimated
250,000 have been displaced as a result of the violence;
- Whereas the instability in Kenya is not rooted in tribal
violence but in a struggle for democracy and concerns that the gains of
the past decade may be lost;
- Whereas the Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs has stated that `serious flaws in the vote tallying process
damaged the credibility of the process' and that the United States
should not `conduct business as usual' in Kenya; and
- Whereas the political instability in Kenya could have
serious political, economic, and security implications for the entire
region: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That
the Congress--
(1) commends the Kenyan people for their commitment to democracy and
respect for the democratic process as evidenced by the high voter
turnout and peaceful voting on election day;
(2) strongly condemns the ongoing violence in Kenya and urges all
parties concerned to immediately end use of violence as a means to
achieve their political objectives;
(3) calls for a peaceful, negotiated settlement of the conflict in
Kenya;
(4) calls on the two leading presidential candidates to accept offers
of external and internal assistance to help find a solution to the
current crisis which has the support of the people of Kenya;
(5) calls on Kenyan security forces to refrain from use of excessive
force and respect the human rights of Kenyan citizens;
(6) calls for those who are found guilty of committing human rights
violations to be held accountable for their actions;
(7) calls for an immediate end to the restrictions on the media, and on
the rights of peaceful assembly and association;
(8) condemns threats to civil society groups, journalists, religious
leaders, human rights activists, who are making every effort towards a
peaceful, just, and equitable political solution to the current
electoral crisis;
(9) calls on the international community, United Nations aid
organizations, and all neighboring countries to provide assistance to
those affected by violence and encourages to use all the diplomatic
means at their disposal to persuade relevant political actors to commit
to a peaceful resolution to the current crisis; and
(10) urges the President of the United States to--
(A) support diplomatic efforts to facilitate a
dialogue between leaders of
the Party of National
Unity, the Orange Democratic Movement, and
other relevant actors;
(B) consider the imposition of targeted sanctions,
including a travel ban and
asset freeze, on leaders in the Party of
National Unity, the
Orange
Democratic Movement, and
other relevant
actors who refuse to engage
in meaningful dialogue to end the
current crisis; and
(C) conduct a review of current U.S. aid to Kenya for the
purposes of
restricting all non-humanitarian
assistance to Kenya unless the parties are
able to establish a peaceful political
resolution to the current crisis which
is credible to the Kenyan people.
- Sent by Judy Miriga
=====================================================